Comments on: Friday Finance Followers – Tennis Edition

By: harvestwages

harvestwages — Mon, 15 Mar 2010 18:15:15 +0000

Hey Kyle,
Tennis too is my passion. But only when it come to watching. how i wish i ever had time playing. My bogging passion eats it up.
harvestwagesÂ´s last blog ..How Social Media Sites Make Money Online

By: Paul @ FiscalGeek

Paul @ FiscalGeek — Mon, 15 Mar 2010 16:47:19 +0000

Thanks for the linkup Kyle and happy Monday to you. Can I just say that I hate daylight savings time?
Paul @ FiscalGeekÂ´s last blog ..An Insiders View of the Mortgage Industry â€“ Podcast Vol. 2

By: Revanche

Revanche — Fri, 12 Mar 2010 19:55:40 +0000

Thanks for the link, Kyle! And I second the motion that Clarifinancial write a follow-up post, I think those nitty gritty details are really important when you’re making a decision about purchasing life insurance. You should know what you’re getting into and I know firsthand that my knowledge comes from textbooks – I couldn’t get my insurance company to give me the time of day regarding any questions about my policy!
Revanche´s last blog ..Foodie Friday: Potting Pies

By: Evan

Evan — Fri, 12 Mar 2010 14:57:18 +0000

VULs created in the 80s depending on interest rates in the teens are a great example of this type of problem. That being said there are plenty of products that do guarantee up to 121 regardless of interest rates (as long as you keep paying lol).
Evan´s last blog ..What is Wrong With Chasing Bank Rates

By: Kyle

Kyle — Fri, 12 Mar 2010 13:51:17 +0000

Don’t be sorry, I think a follow up post would be solid… even better a follow up guest post on Suburban Dollar.

By: Aaron @ Clarifinancial

Aaron @ Clarifinancial — Fri, 12 Mar 2010 13:48:40 +0000

Fair enough. I didn’t want to get all noodly and technical with that post, maybe I should write the follow-up.

It could be something as simple as living to age 96 when your policy only goes to 95. But more commonly, it’s that certain assumptions in the sales illustration (emphasis on sales) didn’t come true.

That’s not to say buying an assumptive policy instead of a guaranteed policy is wrong. It just means you should be aware of how permanent your permanent policy could be.

See, it’s already article length. Sorry.