<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: The Foreclosure Across the Street</title> <atom:link href="http://www.suburbandollar.com/2009/04/21/the-foreclosure-across-the-street/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.suburbandollar.com/2009/04/21/the-foreclosure-across-the-street/#utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=the-foreclosure-across-the-street</link> <description>Where finance and reality meet</description> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 21:54:17 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" /> <item><title>By: Weekend Reading: Links Of The Week 4/25/09 &#124; Man Vs. Debt</title><link>http://www.suburbandollar.com/2009/04/21/the-foreclosure-across-the-street/#comment-351</link> <dc:creator>Weekend Reading: Links Of The Week 4/25/09 &#124; Man Vs. Debt</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 22:00:47 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.suburbandollar.com/?p=684#comment-351</guid> <description>[...] Suburban Dollar contemplates the dilemma of caring for a home abandoned due to foreclosure. [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Suburban Dollar contemplates the dilemma of caring for a home abandoned due to foreclosure. [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: The Weakonomist</title><link>http://www.suburbandollar.com/2009/04/21/the-foreclosure-across-the-street/#comment-332</link> <dc:creator>The Weakonomist</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 19:11:01 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.suburbandollar.com/?p=684#comment-332</guid> <description>My future mother in law mows the grass on some undeveloped proporty down the steer. It&#039;s her was of cleaning up since we take the boxer down there to do his twosies.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My future mother in law mows the grass on some undeveloped proporty down the steer. It&#8217;s her was of cleaning up since we take the boxer down there to do his twosies.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Trevor @ Financial Nut</title><link>http://www.suburbandollar.com/2009/04/21/the-foreclosure-across-the-street/#comment-330</link> <dc:creator>Trevor @ Financial Nut</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 19:03:17 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.suburbandollar.com/?p=684#comment-330</guid> <description>I wouldn&#039;t touch anything. It&#039;s not mine. If anything, it&#039;s the bank or mortgage company that gave them the money. If it was one of these bad subprime deals, it might be some foreign investor&#039;s property. Who knows?!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wouldn&#8217;t touch anything. It&#8217;s not mine. If anything, it&#8217;s the bank or mortgage company that gave them the money. If it was one of these bad subprime deals, it might be some foreign investor&#8217;s property. Who knows?!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Bible Money Matters</title><link>http://www.suburbandollar.com/2009/04/21/the-foreclosure-across-the-street/#comment-328</link> <dc:creator>Bible Money Matters</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 18:07:04 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.suburbandollar.com/?p=684#comment-328</guid> <description>I wouldn&#039;t take anything from the inside, but I think I might help take care of the outside, just because it does indirectly affect the value of my home.  Plus, who wants to look at an overgrown unkempt lawn?    Keeping up the neighborhood is in everyone&#039;s best interest.  I&#039;ve lived in neighborhoods where no one cared - and it showed. I don&#039;t want to live in a place like that again.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wouldn&#8217;t take anything from the inside, but I think I might help take care of the outside, just because it does indirectly affect the value of my home.  Plus, who wants to look at an overgrown unkempt lawn?    Keeping up the neighborhood is in everyone&#8217;s best interest.  I&#8217;ve lived in neighborhoods where no one cared &#8211; and it showed. I don&#8217;t want to live in a place like that again.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Baker @ ManVsDebt</title><link>http://www.suburbandollar.com/2009/04/21/the-foreclosure-across-the-street/#comment-327</link> <dc:creator>Baker @ ManVsDebt</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 15:01:05 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.suburbandollar.com/?p=684#comment-327</guid> <description>I saw this all the time when I dealt with foreclosure real estate.  Often times, it was the people the bank sent out to the property to take pictures and otherwise &quot;secure&quot; the property (change locks, etc...).  They would take trucks and haul off refrigerators, washer/dryers, beds, and other household items.  Obviously, the bank would just assume the homeowner had taken everything.
Ultimately, even if a little bit, these type of things cause the bank to get less out of the home, which hurts everyone (accept the people who took the items).  When you are talking about a matter of personal trinkets, though it is a different story.
Taking care of the outside of the property directly increases the value of all the surrounding homes, so in a sense you are getting paid to do it.  Or rather, you have some interest.  I have heard of people doing this and then billing the bank.  I specifically know people who have gotten paid this way!
Good luck in getting this turned around with minimal damage to your own home prices!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw this all the time when I dealt with foreclosure real estate.  Often times, it was the people the bank sent out to the property to take pictures and otherwise &#8220;secure&#8221; the property (change locks, etc&#8230;).  They would take trucks and haul off refrigerators, washer/dryers, beds, and other household items.  Obviously, the bank would just assume the homeowner had taken everything.</p><p>Ultimately, even if a little bit, these type of things cause the bank to get less out of the home, which hurts everyone (accept the people who took the items).  When you are talking about a matter of personal trinkets, though it is a different story.</p><p>Taking care of the outside of the property directly increases the value of all the surrounding homes, so in a sense you are getting paid to do it.  Or rather, you have some interest.  I have heard of people doing this and then billing the bank.  I specifically know people who have gotten paid this way!</p><p>Good luck in getting this turned around with minimal damage to your own home prices!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
